velvet.pro

Those 2 boards are quite different so each has its own number system. The reason is that the NSR board has a shorter nose piece so I have to measure it 6cm back from that or I get a bad reading from the front 6 cm of the board bending too much where the core is very thin. Also the 7.0 was a copy of a board that was to be made exactly the same as a previously tested board. It really is more for 85 kg but different riders prefer different things. The NSRs are also very stiff in the middle so really work differently as those boards turn more from the nose flexing rather than the middle of the board. This makes them a bit more stable but those do not work as well in vaired snow conditions.
I would like to have a universal measuring system but there are so many board differences it is easier to group them together by designs that are similar.
So unfortunately I am the only one who can give the details as to the numbers as it is all gathered from on hill testing and general rider preference

Bruce писал(а):The 5.9+5 is my in house stiffness measuring system. The +5 tells me how much decamber is used at the tip and tail.

Zemely писал(а):ПРО ИНДЕКС после плюса:
Чем больше число, тем жестче платы, если она имеет ту же длину и тип правления. Около 4 вес всадника кг - единица.

au писал(а):при помощи листов находим границы рокеров, измеряем рулеткой

au писал(а):наших, да, на вельвете посчитаем.

au писал(а):Soumi Coiler Session? :-D
Who owns this red prototype?